John Plodinec in Community Resilience: Covid-19: Disasters Have Direction
by John Plodinec
This is an updating of an old post. The original did not have any specific examples; I think Covid-19 provides a good one. I’m sure the concept “Disasters Have Direction” is obvious to many of you, but I’ve never seen it articulated. As I try to show in the discussion of the pandemic, it can be a useful construct as we think about a community’s resilience.
For a few years, FEMA and DHS have championed the idea of an “All Hazards – Maximum of Maxima” approach to planning. The basic premise is that if a community plans for the worst of the worst, then it will be prepared for whatever may actually happen. This is a deceptively simple tautology that I think deserves a little more analysis than it usually receives, especially in terms of community resilience.
Let’s start by looking at an idealized community. A community can be thought of as an ecosystem. There is a “human layer,” made up of individuals and families. There is an institutional layer, consisting of private businesses and other economic institutions, and all of the other “human-serving” organizations in the community. Then there is the physical, environmental, layer – containing the built and natural environment. All of these are held together by the social capital within the community (some may argue whether the physical layer is bound to the community by its social capital, but that’s a subject for another post!).